|
Home > Examples > Tasks & Rubrics > Foreign Languages
Oral
Evaluation Rubric
CONTENT: 3 Complete. The speaker clearly conveys the main idea and provides details that are relevant and interesting. 2 Generally complete. The speaker conveys the main idea but does not provide adequate relevant details to support it. 1 Incomplete. The main idea is unclear. Much of the detail is irrelevant or non-existent. COMPREHENSIBILITY 3 Comprehensible. The speaker uses appropriate language to convey the main idea of this item clearly. 2 Generally comprehensible. The message is unclear in places. The language used is inadequate to make the message totally clear. 1 Incomprehensible. The message could only be understood by a sympathetic native speaker. The language used is often distorted by interference from English. FLUENCY 3 The student speaks very clearly without hesitation. Pronunciation and intonation sound natural. 2 The student speaks with some hesitation. Problems with pronunciatio do not prevent communication. 1 The student hesitates frequently. Problems with pronunciation distort meaning and inhibit communication in some instances. ACCURACY 3 Functions, grammar, and vocabulary are used correctly. 2 Minor problems in usage do not distort meaning or inhibit communication. 1 Problems in usage significantly distort meaning or inhibit communication. EYE CONTACT 3 Excellent. The student rarely refers to the note cards. 2 Fair. The student often refers to the note cards. 1 Poor. The student reads most of the presentation from the note cards. TOTAL POINTS: /15 COMMENTS: _____________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
|
||
|
Home
| What is it? | Why
do it? | How do you
do it? | Standards
| Tasks | Rubrics|
Examples
| Glossary
Copyright 2008, Jon Mueller. Professor of Psychology, North Central College, Naperville, IL. Comments, questions or suggestions about this website should be sent to the author, Jon Mueller, at jfmueller@noctrl.edu.
|
||