Research Presentation Rubric
|
criteria
|
less
than adequate
|
adequate
|
good
|
very
good
|
excellent
|
| identified key points |
limited or inaccurate summary of key points |
|
summary was accurate but only addressed some important ideas OR thorough summary but inaccurate in a few places |
|
accurately
captured key points
|
| provided appropriate context |
context
was unclear
|
|
context
was fairly well laid out
|
|
placed
research in meaningful context so key points would be understood
|
| used vocabulary accurately |
rarely
|
|
mostly
|
|
always
|
| clearly presented ideas |
confusing
presentation
|
|
clearly
presented in most places
|
|
points
were well understood by audience
|
| engaged the audience |
bored
the audience
|
|
engaged
the audience for most of the presentation
|
|
kept
audience attention throughout presentation
|
| lead effective discussion |
little
help in making connnections
|
|
meaningfully
helped class make connections between article and real world or previous
ideas/research
|
||
| answered questions effectively |
no
|
|
sometimes
|
|
usually
|